Makes me think of those self-portraits drawn by schizophrenics or artists slipping into dementia.
It looks like he mastered painting by 14, and spent the rest of his life trying new ways of expression instead of just doing the same boring style for 80 years
plausible explanation, but i dont think thats the entire story. middle and late middle age looks vaguely pornagraphic, and his artstyle towards the end of his life looks like the kind favored by money launderers.
this and also the first comment, hah
He must have got hooked on PCP or something.
Picasso was quite into heavy drugs early on, morphine and opium for instance. But he quit also, before he turned 30
All his life alcohol was part of his diet, but not to the point of drowning into it
So all in all, I don't think that's the main reason why his style "deperished" over time, rather a symptom of something else; self destruction, he was sort of into it, he had a difficult relationship with his father, who thought him how to paint... So, maybe that's not really painting he was "destructuring" in the end... But his relationship to his father, and it showed in what they shared in common, painting
What was he smoking ?
As much as I don’t like the change, a big part of the modern art scene that he helped create is pushing the limits of form and expression, and breaking free from the structured disciple of the old world.
Artists started to discover you can expres much feeling and emotion through the bastardization and purposeful misrepresentation of form, which focuses more on the concept of the art rather than the image itself.
Unfortunately, architecture, music, and all other forms of creation started to do the same thing, which ruined our societal aesthetic in my opinion
d evolution
(post is archived)