Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

Archive: https://archive.today/PklbZ

From the post:

>A team of explorers believed they discovered an ancient sunken city that would rewrite human history, but the ruins have mysteriously been ignored for 25 years. In 2001, marine engineer Paulina Zelitsky and her husband, Paul Weinzweig, from Advanced Digital Communications (ADC), revealed that they had stumbled upon a collection of stone structures over 2,000 feet underwater near Cuba. Sonar scans of the area showed what looked like multiple pyramids, circular structures, and other buildings that seemed to belong to a lost city in the Caribbean.

Archive: https://archive.today/PklbZ From the post: >>A team of explorers believed they discovered an ancient sunken city that would rewrite human history, but the ruins have mysteriously been ignored for 25 years. In 2001, marine engineer Paulina Zelitsky and her husband, Paul Weinzweig, from Advanced Digital Communications (ADC), revealed that they had stumbled upon a collection of stone structures over 2,000 feet underwater near Cuba. Sonar scans of the area showed what looked like multiple pyramids, circular structures, and other buildings that seemed to belong to a lost city in the Caribbean.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

I remember when I first saw this story and have thought back to it from time to time. If I had to bet on why nobody has been saying anything about this, it would be because anyone who looks into this is going to have to challenge (((accepted facts))) which would mean being refunded, and probably something akin to being canceled from their job.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

archive.today is making me do a never-ending captcha to load the page. Hasn't done that in years for me.

Here is an (((archive.org))) link to the story as well if it is useful: https://web.archive.org/web/20250731045456/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14955663/underwater-lost-city-6000-years-old-reshapes-history.html

And image of the city from the article: !

[–] • 1 pt

It has been hit or miss for me for a while. Maybe I will have to start including both from now on.