Title
>Buried with Dagger in His Back
Who would have ever thought we would have click bait archaeology titles!!
From the article:
>with a Roman dagger, known as a pugio, placed on his back.
>was remarkably well-preserved, found still in its sheath.
Ouch, I posted that planning to read later. It's a sad state of affairs indeed.
It's just weird. I think people reading these type of articles don't really need to be baited into clicking.
I mean yeah, history is pretty fucking interesting and that's just the verifiable bits. I leave it to the individual to determine what those are.
(post is archived)