Chicago’s “Replica” Sword is Actually an Authentic 3,000-Year-Old Weapon

Donate

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

193

•

Chicago’s “Replica” Sword is Actually an Authentic 3,000-Year-Old Weapon (www.ancient-origins.net)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (3).

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Is every fact in the article a lie? For example, if I were to go there would the employee mentioned in the article not work there? Is the Hungarian archaeologist helping with an exhibit fake news? If I visited there would there be no sword exhibit?

parent
link

/s/Archaeology

created ago

About this sub

Welcome to Archeology, a place to post anything relevant to the sciences of the Earth's ancient past. Be it an Archeology, Paleontology, Anthropology, Ancient Text, Shipwreck, Cartography, or a Fossil link, they're all welcome here.

Feel free to add a flair to your link! To add a flair, bring up comments in posted link and select the Flair link, a list of the following flairs will appear:

[Archaeology] [Paleontology] [Anthropology] [Fossils] [Antiquities] [Shipwrecks] [Cartography] [Ancient Texts]