WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

355

I crop images like a mexi-nigger but here is some photos of Antarctic pyramids n’sheeeit

https://pic8.co/sh/H58eer.png https://pic8.co/sh/D3LHGs.png https://pic8.co/sh/Htwvvx.png https://pic8.co/sh/DYO7vo.png https://pic8.co/sh/rgTv1M.png

I crop images like a mexi-nigger but here is some photos of Antarctic pyramids n’sheeeit https://pic8.co/sh/H58eer.png https://pic8.co/sh/D3LHGs.png https://pic8.co/sh/Htwvvx.png https://pic8.co/sh/DYO7vo.png https://pic8.co/sh/rgTv1M.png

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

I've never heard of Antarctic Pyramids!

[–] 2 pts

If you look at the actual photos of them and not this crap, it’s not entirely convincing that they’re man-made pyramids rather than more-uniform-than-normal mountains. Like the main photo in this post clearly shows bricks, which is not what you see in the Antarctic pyramids; it’s probably a photo from Egypt after a snow storm. The third photo from the body of the post is an actual Antarctic pyramid. Notice no bricks and the edges are not straight lines.

They could still be constructed, but this post is deliberately misleading as to what they actually are and what they actually look like

[–] 0 pt

The intriguing part is the fact that you guys believe a natural rock formation would have 4 equalish sloped sides at all implying the wind weather wear came equally from 4 directions and met at a specific point for long enough to creat a pyramid shape, that does not happen in nature. Also, nature would not create 2 of these 4sided pyramid shapes side by side as seen in one the of the photos. Please show 1 example of naturally formed pyramid shapes created by nature. Now show 2 of them side by side. As far as your argument of the lines aren’t perfectly straight on the 3rd image, the Antarctic pyramid theory obviously implies these things are a kajillion years old and covered with thick ass layers of ice and permafrost. Not the mention the fact that this theory also implies massive crustal displacement with Antarctica once being at a different location in reference to the equator. So damage would have been done and permafrost ice would have built up over that. Sorry I’m not a perfect expert and one of my photos has bricks lol imagine that, the guy on the internet making a mistake so now no bother Antarctica is nothing goys the Germans went there for fun and postcards so there is nothing to it. Yes goyem John Kerry went to Antarctica on trumps Inauguration Day for no reason. Also patriarch kirill went there for a simple photo op with penguins Move along goy no reason to look at Antarctica at all because op made a mistake a posted a photo that shows brick so it may be from Egypt.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

The photo with two pyramids is not from Antarctica. Thank you for proving my main point.

The actual intriguing part is that you think that with the thousands/millions of rock formations across the globe, none of them could ever end up looking generally uniform. The fact is, one happened and it happens to be in Antarctica. You’re also ignoring that it’s significantly less uniform than any of the man-made pyramids we see in Egypt or Latin/South America. It just “seems” more uniform than you expect a natural rock formation to look. Amazing how you think thousands of years of frost will damage a pyramid enough to ruin its uniformity but thousands of years of literal sand-blasting in desert winds doesn’t have nearly as detrimental of an effect on the Egyptian pyramids.

Shit, there’s a front page post today showing a rock formation that looks just like a nigger’s head. Do you think aliens carved it? Give nature enough time and space and it can make anything look like anything eventually. Wind erosion is not needed to make the shape of any mountain, it’s just formed by two plates pushing together and jutting upward. And no, it’s not impossible for one to jut up mostly evenly