Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (32).
[–] • 0 pt

9&10 are effectively useless legally according to the legal teams involved in litigating federal overreach on rural roads in Nevada. If you read them they are clear, but you would may note that no cases before the supremes hang their hat on amendments 9&10. i am not a lawfag

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

When states start to use the 10th unconstitutional jewtus precedent still matters

Yes. Everything is fuck. Understood. jewtus precedent says infringement of guns is legal, and that's extremely wrong. If states are going to tell the federal government to fuck off with regards to guns, what makes you think they'll do it nowhere else?

Consider it this way: if states' starting point telling the federalgov to fuck off is with regards to guns, then they're basically telling them to fuck off EVERYWHERE ELSE. Simply put just "fuck off" with no qualifier.