WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

816

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

xiden muh China

Commit suicide and do your bloodline a favor.

[–] 0 pt

If you are actually paying attention, they don't need to do any of that. If they figure out how to get HR1 passed, they've got everything they want at that moment (control the elections, not that those matter). If that passes, nothing the red states can or will do will matter as they'll be dragged into federal court and all those states will start to "flip". The die was cast with the 14th Amendment and giving the State the power to enforce equality.

The revolution is already playing out, most are too stupid to realize that it is currently happening because it doesn't match what they've read and are expecting.

[–] 1 pt

States are beginning to understand the power of the 10th federal court matters

What you say isn't bad, it's just not right. First thing we need to do is understand that if we're going to talk about this post we need to do so from the context laid forth in the post. That context is one of States' finally understanding the 10th amendment. At that point the federal government loses any power it has. Like, any and all. Despite my hatred of the false-dichotomy of left/right (2 party) descriptions, it applies here. The reason it's important is that red states aren't sucking off the federal teet. They are the federal teet. It's the blue states being welfared by the red states and this is well known. The moment, as I've laid out; that red states do begin to use the 10th, is the moment blue states start literally drying up from lack of food, power, resources etc.

But hey, red states won't get niggerball A, niggerball B, jewllywood, or gayming anymore. So...

[–] 1 pt

So long as the Federal Reserve exists, the feds will always have the power. It won't matter what the states do individually.

[–] 0 pt

9&10 are effectively useless legally according to the legal teams involved in litigating federal overreach on rural roads in Nevada. If you read them they are clear, but you would may note that no cases before the supremes hang their hat on amendments 9&10. i am not a lawfag