That works on a small site where people know one another by username and posts. It fails as a site gets larger and you can create false consensus. Most people don't want to hear both sides because we are so damn sure we are right. On dakon I down voted beatlejuice for calling another poster a pedophile and his few other bullshit posts. Am I supposed to waste time arguing with someone like that? I agree with you in spirit and mostly in practice but some people just aren't worth arguing with
Another problem is burn out trying to point out that someone is a shill every single time. Trying to form a well worded and logical response to how they are shilling. Then your reply getting zero attention, just because it is too long to read.
I remember on Voat, when SBBH and SDBH came around, people were saying that it was SRS shitting up the place. Sure enough I didn't read it, didn't really notice the issue till half a year ago.
Because of the issue, some of some of the most dedicated and content creating users walked away from the platform. Leaving Voat a cesspool, without logical discourse, mindlessly sucking off everything that was a confimation bias.
If I see SRS here, I will downvote them. They are not here to create thought provoking discourse. Only to forum slide and gas-light all over the site.
Burn out was the reason I deleted, you can only argue seemingly pointlessly for so long. Pmboobs is well intended but what are we going to do watch them butty us in down voted and try to. Talk to them?
Honestly. I would say yes waste you’re time on the argument. Becuase when other people look at it it isn’t a waste of time. Sure it might not get a lot of people thinking but even if it gets one isn’t it worth it? If you can change one persons mind and wake them up to reality haven’t you succeeded? I haven’t seen the behavior from beetle you have a problem with and honestly I’m glad I haven’t I don’t need anymore enemies I have plenty. However if you could just blow a argument out of the water you win right? I think above all things argument wins.
(post is archived)