WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

428

Pedophilia is not acceptable in any form and Poal has a zero tolerance regarding it.

In the past months, several cubicle glownigger accounts have been banned for trying to normalize that degeneracy, by pushing memes, jokes, innuendoes, and discussions regarding the age of consent...

So if you want to help poal, feel free to report them.

Thanks to all of you poalrs who already and actively did.

Poal's ToS

## Pedophilia is not acceptable in any form and Poal has a **zero tolerance** regarding it. In the past months, several cubicle glownigger accounts have been banned for trying to normalize that degeneracy, by pushing memes, jokes, innuendoes, and discussions regarding the age of consent... So if you want to help poal, feel free to report them. Thanks to all of you poalrs who already and actively did. [Poal's ToS](https://poal.co/tos)

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Way to exaggerate one single user (me) asking the same query on clarification of TOS. We all know cp and those that advocate it are disgusting and degenerate. However my question is legitimate (been 6 days now and still no actual answer). Otherwise multiple posts under 'citizen investigation/ pizzagate type posts' clearly go against TOS. Zero tolerance for content as outlined in TOS states insta-perma bans for all the users that made those posts and all those that supported / upvoted those posts.

However, it seems the admin and everyone else will not clarify if 'news reports, articles, citizen investigation type posts (clearly not in support of the content they show) will result in perma-bans for containing material outlined in TOS.

Aside from the plethora of content found/ posted by users in pizzagate, Anyone else remember - All the screencaps of sarah silverman, bob faget, gilbert godfrey, john legend and his whoore gf etc all making 'explicit jokes, innuendos, conversations involving minors' - i do. Under the TOS, would all those that posted and upvoted that content would be perma-banned or no ??.

Remember the link to the ytube/bitchute on here recently (iirc) of a Mother reading an excerpt from a pro-lgbt-p book from her 10/12 yr old daughter's school library at a School board meeting that depicted 'sexually explicit acts between minors' - i do. Is that against TOS resulting in a perma ban for the user and those that upvoted or no ?.

Does a post/ link to a video of an 'undercover reporter' that filmed 'gays in a bar having conversations about describing the age of the youngest minor they have ever abused and when they were first abused by an adult' go against the TOS resulting in a pernma-ban and for those that supported / upvoted or no.

Edit: I'm sure you will clarify for everyone and those that support/ upvote those type of posts ( that shed light on those in entertainment and positions of authority, using the degenerates own social media posts etc to show proof of their degeneracy under the context of 'news reports, articles ,citizen investigations et al' are against TOS and get insta perma-bans.

EDIT2: Nope , im asking bc i honestly don't know the answer, and on other platforms TOS is also used as a way for glowies, kikes, joo's and lgtb-pedo lovers to shut down legitimate citizen investigations exposing their degeneracy. You could have just stated 'Up to me after a post has been reported' so Zero Tolerance is clarified and the afore mentioned wont bother reporting posts that are exposing them and their kind .

[–] 0 pt

However my question is legitimate (been 6 days now and still no actual answer).

lol And you still have no clue why you haven't got one?

Go back to fakevoat, Shlomo.

Don't you see your concern trolling doesn't work here and no one cares about it?