WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

494

Pedophilia is not acceptable in any form and Poal has a zero tolerance regarding it.

In the past months, several cubicle glownigger accounts have been banned for trying to normalize that degeneracy, by pushing memes, jokes, innuendoes, and discussions regarding the age of consent...

So if you want to help poal, feel free to report them.

Thanks to all of you poalrs who already and actively did.

Poal's ToS

## Pedophilia is not acceptable in any form and Poal has a **zero tolerance** regarding it. In the past months, several cubicle glownigger accounts have been banned for trying to normalize that degeneracy, by pushing memes, jokes, innuendoes, and discussions regarding the age of consent... So if you want to help poal, feel free to report them. Thanks to all of you poalrs who already and actively did. [Poal's ToS](https://poal.co/tos)

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

Unless someone is really fucking stupid, they won't be spreading pornographic images of children around the internet. And if someone feels the need to see the pics for proof or whatever, that's just because they are a pedo themselves. Simple as that.

[–] 5 pts

I for one appreciate this. There's a certain civic responsibility to know what's on there given the commingled finances of Hunter and Pedo Joe, but I really dont want the worst of it burned into my brain and making me dry heave every time Biden is mentioned.

I would hope that any imagery used to prove Biden's degeneracy would be sufficiently redacted so as to not itself constitute obscene materials. Still images only with large black rectangles over the bad parts PLEASE. Frankly, it's disgusting enough just hearing about the contents of that laptop in abstract, viewing the actual contents would probably cause me to vomit.

It's worse than pretty bad when our national leadership is so degenerate that we cannot even DISCUSS their vile actions without losing a little bit of our own innocence in the process. This planet sucks sometimes.

[–] 0 pt

Somewhere in the wild is the raw contents. Not sure who would take it on themselves to make a censored version, maybe a jew. Someone in the justice system will have to review the stuff. But they likely won't release all the censored stuff. What we all suspect has to be somehow confirmed, can't go on a witch hunt. It's bed to procecute the wrong person, and will look bad for those who do it. (More talking about someone there's significantly more reasonable doubt on on them in the last sentence)