WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

347

Since Poal successfully migrated and came back a few days ago, it has been experiencing direct DDoS attacks over ToR (not very effective lol) and some accounts have started inciting others to take violent actions (use of deadly force) which is a ToS violation.

They are now doubling down on getting Poal shut down after several failed attempts (chat and pic8 have also been targeted).

That's what they do when attacks on free speech platforms don't work.

So if you want to help Poal, you can report them by tagging me in the post/comment thread where the cubicle glowies are (or use the report button for level30+).

Also, for those of you upvoting these glowniggers, you will get treated as such (permanent ban).

Since Poal successfully [migrated and came back a few days ago](https://poal.co/p/499621), it has been experiencing direct DDoS attacks over ToR (not very effective lol) and some accounts have started inciting others to take violent actions (use of deadly force) which is a ToS violation. They are now doubling down on getting Poal shut down after several failed attempts (chat and pic8 have also been targeted). That's what they do when attacks on free speech platforms don't work. So if you want to help Poal, you can report them by tagging me in the post/comment thread where the cubicle glowies are (or use the report button for level30+). Also, for those of you upvoting these glowniggers, you will get treated as such (permanent ban).

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Could you clarify? Poalers with any sense are familiar with the legal definition of calls to violence and are onboard with you removing unlawful content such as "We should go kill Homer Simpson on Tuesday January 10th in 1992 in the library with the wrench" because that's an incitement to violence (or assault, terroristic threats, etc...the exact crime label depends on the jurisdiction). If Poal's ToS exceeds the legal definition, it's important to be very clear on what Poal's ToS prohibits to avoid damaging trust in the community due to a mismatch between the rules as written (calls to violence have a discrete legal meaning) and the rules as enforced.

TLDR: We love Poal and want to avoid a Reddit situation where people follow the rules and still gets the banstick because the site admin isn't enforcing the rules but rather "whatever the admin arbitrarily doesn't like depending on the alignment of the planets, which side of the bed he woke up on, and this morning's horoscope".

[–] 0 pt

Remember. The terms could have different legal meanings in different jurisdictions. Better be safe and keep this platform no?

[–] 0 pt

If Poal's ToS exceeds the legal definition, it's important to be very clear on what Poal's ToS prohibits

No calls to violence means what it means.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

We need to implement new policy to introduce the death penalty for convicted pedophiles who have harmed children.

OK? or not OK?

Death penalty for kid fuckers!

OK? or not OK?

Hang pedos! Fuck their due process!

OK? or not OK?

xxxx

OK? or not OK?

It might be good to know where the line is.

[–] 0 pt

You crossed it with the last one.

You can now remove it.