Although our Content Standards, following the First Amendment, do not proscribe offensive speech, we strongly encourage you to ensure that your User Contributions are cordial and civil. The foundation of a free society requires people to peacefully settle their differences through dialogue and debate. Gab exists to promote the free flow of information online. It is our view that the responsible exercise of one’s free speech rights is its own reward and, as a general rule, the most well-respected online publishers tend to be the ones who behave the most civilly and put forward their arguments most intelligently.
As of now, Gab still allows nigger and kike realism. They have 1488 groups, seems friendly enough, 'for now'.
I'm sorry to hear this. There will be growing repercussions for saying things like 'nigger', 'faggot' or 'kike', even on Gab... The skin of the world is just too thin. Rest assured the muzzle will only get tighter as time passes in regards to wrong-think offenses.
They're going to take "nigger" away from me? Oh nooooo!
Don't worry I'll keep calling you a nigger even if I have to use smoke signals or carrier pigeons.
The correct nomenclature is Basketball-American.
They can never take that. "Nigger" echoes into eternity.
I already think posts on gab that mention Jewish truths get some sort of deranging in the algorithm. Just hunch bit stuff posted with Jewish truth will get few views from the same account that gets a lot for other posts.
Your experiences there welcome. Not sure if it's happening so would like more users experiences.
My posts (and replies to other posts) where I was deriding the Abrahamic-based religions vanished within days. At least one was entirely jew-targeted. Gab defends xtians with zeal, and I suspect jews with less zeal...but both are shielded from criticism to some degree.
Never been on Gab, I understand it's a honeypot.
And then he banned Patrick Little.
Doesn't seem like the place that would be him now imo
Try anyway
I don't see a way to contact them in their profile. I haven't used gab for quite some time.
I thought GAB used Sibyl Systems Ltd. for hosting. Some other censorship resistant hosting alternative built on block chain tech: https://akash.network/ , https://www.golem.network/ , https://www.runonflux.io/flux-nodes .
Voat.xyz has a website. Maybe use whatever the fuck .xyz is? Also, there are probably foreign countries that aren't kike controlled. Maybe an Argentinian web host or something.
The domain and extension have nothing to do with the hosting.
I'm looking at hosts and will decide which one is the most based for the task.
Who hosts Stormfront and Daily Stormer?
Yeah, ok, Stormfront is probably hosted at Langley.
Just wanted to jump in here, since this is something I know a bit about.
There are a few moving parts:
The REGISTRY. This is the database and, by extension, the company that owns the database, for a given top-level domain or country-code domain (e.g., .com, .org, .us, .co.uk, etc.). They can take issue with you and deny or revoke your domain name. Though generally they don't.
The REGISTRAR. This is the company that's licensed by the REGISTRY owner to sell domain names in that top-level or country-code domain. In effect, they sell entries in a database table. These are the people you deal with when buying a domain, typically. They CAN be the same as the REGISTRY owner, but usually aren't. They can take issue with you and deny or revoke your domain name, and sometimes do.
The AUTHORITATIVE DNS HOST. This is the company or individual that runs the nameservers that are listed as the authoritative nameservers when you buy a domain name. They can be literally anyone, including yourself. But REGISTRARS often sell DNS hosting services and try to package it with a domain name purchase. But you can also just stand up BIND 9 on a virtual private server (VPS) on somethine like Linode and do your own DNS hosting. Or use something like CloudFlare just for DNS (or also for DDoS protection) for free. DNS hosting providers rarely give a shit about the names they resolve. Though sometimes they do, as they're the hidden "off switch" of the internet: if you can't resolve a name, whatever that name points to is pretty much dead in the water, unless you can get people to memorize and type in your IP address all the time.
The WEB HOST. This is the company or individual that runs the webserver that hosts the website and (usually) any backend services it needs. This is the entity that controls the computer at the IP for the A resource record in DNS that your website's fully-qualified domain name in DNS points to. This can also literally be anyone, but REGISTRARS also try to bundle this with your name purchase. They can and often do take issue with the websites they host, so choose carefully.
As you can see, there are multiple bits involved here, and you can choose separate registrar, dns host, and web hosting providers. It's usually a good idea to do this for resiliency, and in the case of DNS, it's actually industry best practice to have multiple disparate DNS hosts, from different companies, on different Autonomous Systems (AS). But many people forget this, and it's why some big services go down intermittently, because they don't properly diversify their authoritative DNS.
True. I know you will find a way. Our natural right to freeze peach will find a way.
The foundation of a free society requires people to peacefully settle their differences through dialogue and debate
Ending an argument with fuck you nigger faggot isn't unacceptable?
(post is archived)