WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

239
So we've seen this talked about this a few times since downvotes on posts became public for users over level 6. The goal of making them public for posts was to prevent brigading and it has been pretty effective. A few users didn't like it and left. I think some of those people came back under new names. So the question is, should we do the same for comments, IE add a comment details button something similar that allows users over level 6 to see who downvoted their comments. We are looking forward to what the community thinks.

So we've seen this talked about this a few times since downvotes on posts became public for users over level 6. The goal of making them public for posts was to prevent brigading and it has been pretty effective. A few users didn't like it and left. I think some of those people came back under new names.

So the question is, should we do the same for comments, IE add a comment details button something similar that allows users over level 6 to see who downvoted their comments.

We are looking forward to what the community thinks.

This poll is now closed.

Yes
81 % (50 votes)
No
16 % (10 votes)
Other - Please comment
3 % (2 votes)

(post is archived)

[–] -1 pt

Wut? I remember when Ellen Pao acted the role of psudointellectual towards r/The_Donald via fake laughter.

We're glad you left (which you didn't really because you need to recruit members from our site)

[–] 2 pts

Your site? That’s a bit presumptuous if you to claim voat as your own isn’t it?

[–] 0 pt

Presumptuous of what?

[–] 3 pts

You implied voat was your site(also I don’t recruit users on voat anymore I haven’t for a long time and it was never recruiting it was telling people about an alternative I believe competition is good) Considering I’m guessing you haven’t even donated to voat seems presumptuous to claim it as your own.