Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

At least in the USSR you had what appeared to be manly leaders, the promotion of ideals such as the family, masculinity was encouraged, there was national pride.

I look at America and I think, what is this shit? A nation of shopping malls where you work yourself to death for, certain people. Where your children are taught to hate themselves and country daily.

Man do you ever stop and think how ludicrous this system is?!?

At least in the USSR you had what appeared to be manly leaders, the promotion of ideals such as the family, masculinity was encouraged, there was national pride. I look at America and I think, what is this shit? A nation of shopping malls where you work yourself to death for, certain people. Where your children are taught to hate themselves and country daily. Man do you ever stop and think how ludicrous this system is?!?

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

I would rather have a literal interpretation of the original Constitution.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Neither. And no, it isn't an "either/or" question.

I'd see both become a radioactive shithole.

[–] • 0 pt

Chinese commie control would be better than parasite commie control. At least Chinese are humans.

[–] • 0 pt

No system involving millions of people will work. It was already hard to not have corruption when we were just hunters-gatherers living in small communities.

There will always be a class system. Even in the USSR there was the Nomenclatura. Kids of high members of the party were living the dream but if you were born in a cabbage kolkhoze your chances of making it to the top were not higher than if you were born in the middle of the plains of the midwest in the US in a poor family