Only white nationalists have the right answer No more immigration, remigration, with an overall policy favoring white natality. And not just for two weeks, forever We didn't build our countries for africans or arabs or chinese or mexicans or turks or for the sake of the rest of the world, this has to be clear, fucking clear In about what now? 20 years? 50? White europeans become an absolute ethnic minority in their respective homelands, which will evidently be a disaster and not just for whites I mean, that's our entire identity at stake, spencer is absolutely right, and civic naionalists are by definition, unable to address this issue, they are cucked by their own ideology. Alex jones is no exception. He is unable to go on that terrain, cucked It's not about hating the other ethnic groups, it's about preserving our own Problem is that other ethnic groups never will accept to vote for their own removal, that's not going to happen. I wish it would, to settle this issue peacefully, but they won't, so... What has to happen will happen, and they'll only have themselves to blame. Because let's face it, this isn't going to end well, it never does, from kossovo to south africa, it never does end well Never has https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/02/24/aristotle-on-immigration-diversity-and-democracy/ Aristotle is greatly concerned with the preservation of civil peace in the city-state. One of the most common causes of “faction” and civil war, he says, was the unhappy consequences of unassimilated immigration and the consequent diversity. Aristotle’s prose is perfectly clear: Heterogeneity of stocks may lead to faction – at any rate until they have had time to assimilate. A city cannot be constituted from any chance collection of people, or in any chance period of time. Most of the cities which have admitted settlers, either at the time of their foundation or later, have been troubled by faction. For example, the Achaeans joined with settlers from Troezen in founding Sybaris, but expelled them when their own numbers increased; and this involved their city in a curse. At Thurii the Sybarites quarreled with the other settlers who had joined them in its colonization; they demanded special privileges, on the ground that they were the owners of the territory, and were driven out of the colony. At Byzantium the later settlers were detected in a conspiracy against the original colonists, and were expelled by force; and a similar expulsion befell the exiles from Chios who were admitted to Antissa by the original colonists. At Zancle, on the other hand, the original colonists were themselves expelled by the Samians whom they admitted. At Apollonia, on the Black Sea, factional conflict was caused by the introduction of new settlers; at Syracuse the conferring of civic rights on aliens and mercenaries, at the end of the period of the tyrants, led to sedition and civil war; and at Amphipolis the original citizens, after admitting Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by the colonists they had admitted. (1303A13) Thus, immigration of different peoples was a common source of conflict, often leading to civil war and concluding with the ethnic cleansing of either the native peoples or the invaders. ... This, is the future All over the west