The purpose is not exactly to win the case, just to bring it to public consciousness.
Nice try though.
So do you propose we hold a public "vote" to decide on implementing these laws? Or do we just need to "vote" the right guys in to make sure it passes?
You seem like a smart guy trying to do what is right, which is the only reason I am bothering to get you to see that they would rather kill you before they would let you win the game.
The second one is already on the book to some degree and there are lawsuit related to what OP is talking about. You can't teach kids to hate themselves.
Call me a pessimist but I have no hope for courts to ever fix anything anymore.
Bring the issues to the fore of the collective consciousness and you change the culture by making what lurked in the shadows the subject of common debate.
That's the key of these legal warfare moves, changing the cultural landscape and drawing attention to a little observed but highly influential part of society.
Once people ask the right questions and care about the right things, greater change is inevitable.
Good luck with that, you can just take a quick look around and see how much they have to drown out your signal and before you can even collect your thoughts they will have made your very existence illegal.
It would be a lot easier to accept being an extremist and make progress unshackled by their rules, and convincing your friends to do the same will only help you in the long run. They are coming for you right now, in your food and the health of your bodies. How much long can your allies survive before inflation starves you of any opportunity?
(post is archived)