Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

340

The first is a political push for a single new law: academic fraud should be made into an offense punishable by fines or jail time. A simple law that would easily do serious damage to the corruption in the academic institutions of your country. A law that can easily gain the support of most of your countrymen.

Thr second is a lawsuit launched against your educational system arguing that the curriculum of historical education is purposefully designed to incite hatred and self-loathing in the students towards people of Caucasian descent by presenting an Intentionally skewed historical narrative that gives the false impression of European ethnicities as being morally inferior to all other races of mankind. In the wake of the controversy regarding CRT, this can easily be pushed by those who know how to advocate for this in such a way as to appeal to most people.

The first is a political push for a single new law: academic fraud should be made into an offense punishable by fines or jail time. A simple law that would easily do serious damage to the corruption in the academic institutions of your country. A law that can easily gain the support of most of your countrymen. Thr second is a lawsuit launched against your educational system arguing that the curriculum of historical education is purposefully designed to incite hatred and self-loathing in the students towards people of Caucasian descent by presenting an Intentionally skewed historical narrative that gives the false impression of European ethnicities as being morally inferior to all other races of mankind. In the wake of the controversy regarding CRT, this can easily be pushed by those who know how to advocate for this in such a way as to appeal to most people.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] • 0 pt

So do you propose we hold a public "vote" to decide on implementing these laws? Or do we just need to "vote" the right guys in to make sure it passes?

You seem like a smart guy trying to do what is right, which is the only reason I am bothering to get you to see that they would rather kill you before they would let you win the game.

[–] • 1 pt

The second one is already on the book to some degree and there are lawsuit related to what OP is talking about. You can't teach kids to hate themselves.

[–] • 0 pt

Call me a pessimist but I have no hope for courts to ever fix anything anymore.

[–] • 1 pt

You are right about that, but it depends where you sue. If you get DC, Northern District of California/New York, you are done for.

[–] • 0 pt

Bring the issues to the fore of the collective consciousness and you change the culture by making what lurked in the shadows the subject of common debate.

That's the key of these legal warfare moves, changing the cultural landscape and drawing attention to a little observed but highly influential part of society.

Once people ask the right questions and care about the right things, greater change is inevitable.

[–] • 0 pt

Good luck with that, you can just take a quick look around and see how much they have to drown out your signal and before you can even collect your thoughts they will have made your very existence illegal.

It would be a lot easier to accept being an extremist and make progress unshackled by their rules, and convincing your friends to do the same will only help you in the long run. They are coming for you right now, in your food and the health of your bodies. How much long can your allies survive before inflation starves you of any opportunity?

[–] • 0 pt

The lawsuit isn't something they can just drown out.

It's a real tangible entity that they will have to deal with, or they will be dealing with the consequences of refusing to deal with it.

Our opponents aren't stupid, they are malicious, we should be thinking about what they are thinking about, and planning our moves accordingly.

A big problem here is our own stubborn refusal to want to learn how the enemy actually thinks, this is a lethal flaw that must be addressed.

You can't just make assumptions about the enemy mind, you must study and investigate to determine if they really line up with what you assume they are like on the inside.