WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

144

Actually... That makes a lot of sense. Just like some lib saying "just google it". Yeah, we did, you were wrong and you won't believe us even if we show you.

Now they use "AI" and think they are smarter than you because a bot told them something.

Archive: https://archive.today/J6m4M

From the post:

>On January 6th, 1995 two bank robbers in Pittsburgh confused law enforcement by not making any attempts to conceal their faces but instead brazenly looking at security cameras as if they were invisible. The reason is that they actually thought they were. Clifton Earl Johnson had convinced his fellow in crime, McArthur Wheeler that covering their faces in lime juice would make them invisible to cameras. Much like lime juice can be “invisible ink” until you heat the paper. As a test, Johnson had taken a polaroid of Wheeler that showed his face smudged. That a camera fault might be the cause, or doing a second test didn’t get to their mind.

Actually... That makes a lot of sense. Just like some lib saying "just google it". Yeah, we did, you were wrong and you won't believe us even if we show you. Now they use "AI" and think they are smarter than you because a bot told them something. Archive: https://archive.today/J6m4M From the post: >>On January 6th, 1995 two bank robbers in Pittsburgh confused law enforcement by not making any attempts to conceal their faces but instead brazenly looking at security cameras as if they were invisible. The reason is that they actually thought they were. Clifton Earl Johnson had convinced his fellow in crime, McArthur Wheeler that covering their faces in lime juice would make them invisible to cameras. Much like lime juice can be “invisible ink” until you heat the paper. As a test, Johnson had taken a polaroid of Wheeler that showed his face smudged. That a camera fault might be the cause, or doing a second test didn’t get to their mind.

Be the first to comment!