WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

107

Well, before they decided that maybe they should be a for-profit company instead of a non-profit "open source" company I think they lose the right to just suck up the entire internet to make a profit.. Then again, is that not what companies like google/facebook/microsoft/etc have been doing for decades?

Archive: https://archive.today/8UEfm

From the post:

>OpenAI is begging the British Parliament to allow it to use copyrighted works because it's supposedly "impossible" for the company to train its artificial intelligence models — and continue growing its multi-billion-dollar business — without them.

Well, before they decided that maybe they should be a for-profit company instead of a non-profit "open source" company I think they lose the right to just suck up the entire internet to make a profit.. Then again, is that not what companies like google/facebook/microsoft/etc have been doing for decades? Archive: https://archive.today/8UEfm From the post: >>OpenAI is begging the British Parliament to allow it to use copyrighted works because it's supposedly "impossible" for the company to train its artificial intelligence models — and continue growing its multi-billion-dollar business — without them.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Guess what? In a real world, businesses like that go out of business. The CEO didn't consider in his business plan that he had pay for model training data? Next up, we can't afford to pay for electricity to process all that free training data. Oy vey!