Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

892

Archive: https://archive.today/ifK7g

From the post:

>Microsoft may have opened a can of worms with recent comments made by the tech giant's CEO of AI Mustafa Suleyman. The CEO spoke with CNBC's Andrew Ross Sorkin at the Aspen Ideas Festival earlier this week. In his remarks, Suleyman claimed that all content shared on the web is available to be used for AI training unless a content producer says otherwise specifically.

Archive: https://archive.today/ifK7g From the post: >>Microsoft may have opened a can of worms with recent comments made by the tech giant's CEO of AI Mustafa Suleyman. The CEO spoke with CNBC's Andrew Ross Sorkin at the Aspen Ideas Festival earlier this week. In his remarks, Suleyman claimed that all content shared on the web is available to be used for AI training unless a content producer says otherwise specifically.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

all content shared on the web is available to be used for AI training unless a content producer says otherwise specifically.

No, your honor, I did not pirate that music, those movies and that software. It was available on the internet and I used it for AI training purposes.

[–] • 2 pts

Companies like that aren't going to pay attention to robots.txt

[–] • 2 pts

A few companies are already proven to be doing exactly that.

[–] • 1 pt

I do seem to remember reading about that somewhere.

It's like a lock - only keeps the honest criminals out. I gave up trying to moderate search engines and stuff on my web pages over the years. You want to index it, have at it.

[–] • 1 pt

I mean, the claim seems pretty reasonable. The people complaining about this, what… put content out there and then claim retroactively that AI companies aren’t allowed to use it as training data because… the thing they’re using that data for is making too much money?

They put something up for free and now they want their cut?