I said we need a database of local and state officials, the ceos and board of directors that are gleefully enforcing mandates, hospitals, doctors and nurses, medical and pharmacy boards we already know all the feds and bureaucrats are corrupt so that part is easy.
The last list back in 2014-2015 was removed after being deemed a “hit list”. You wouldn’t be able to host a list like this anywhere except a home server and then expect a 3am raid.
Even searching for addresses of certain people will get you flagged and your info turned over to the feds. You’d have to follow them or know someone who lives by them.
Everyone always says the wrong search gets you raided. Are there any times this actually happened?
This is the FBI only, I’m sure other agencies are doing the same and even more remember when the NSA gave the dea all the info on certain drug dealers and told them they couldn’t use the data but could reverse engineer the data to put cases together and nobody would know.
You had Snowden who leaked that big tech was working with government agencies and spying on all of us.
A big one that just leaked:
Accidental leak reveals US government has secretly hit Google with 'keyword warrants' to identify ANYONE searching certain names, addresses, and phone numbers
These are just for nobody’s
Using your gps data for a year old burglary:
High profile:
But one thing the FBI did was unusual. According to an affidavit from Special Agent Andrew Mitchell, the bureau asked Google to turn over records on anyone who had searched for particular terms associated with the Russian hackers—"dcleaks," "guccifer" and ''guccifer june.” The records allowed investigators to determine that Stone, from a computer in Florida, appeared to have searched for some of these phrases prior to the publication of the leaked emails from Guccifer and DCLeaks, indicating he had prior knowledge of their disclosure.
Patrick Toomey, a senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he has never seen the FBI publicly admit to using this method before. For him, the disclosure raised some important questions: Is the FBI now routinely identifying criminal suspects on the basis of search terms they have entered into Google? And is that constitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures?
Those are great examples, thankfully not the one I was worried about.
(post is archived)