Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

162

I figure that a resin based printer would be best for something like miniatures. Detail/accuracy seems like it would be a lot better than most other types.

Archive: https://archive.today/bvJjJ

From the post:

>One amusing thing about following tech news is how often the tech community makes a bold prediction or assertion, only to ultimately be completely wrong. This isn't amusing in a "ha ha, we all make mistakes" kind of way. It's amusing in the way that watching someone confidently stride into a glass door is amusing. You feel bad, but also, they really should have seen that coming.

I figure that a resin based printer would be best for something like miniatures. Detail/accuracy seems like it would be a lot better than most other types. Archive: https://archive.today/bvJjJ From the post: >>One amusing thing about following tech news is how often the tech community makes a bold prediction or assertion, only to ultimately be completely wrong. This isn't amusing in a "ha ha, we all make mistakes" kind of way. It's amusing in the way that watching someone confidently stride into a glass door is amusing. You feel bad, but also, they really should have seen that coming.
[–] • 1 pt

You can do good minis with fdm now without the hassle of donning a Hazmat suit.

The problem or for me with printing minis is getting good modellers or ones that are supported the best. The amount of time I've spent getting the supports right to not ruin detail is not worth not paying for the model.

Only a few which I've had to actually split the model up have come out good and saved me $70-$150

[–] • 1 pt

I'm still waiting for the paperless office.

[–] • 1 pt

Reminds me of the 'Year of the Linux Desktop'. We're still waiting.