WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

382

Communism is based on the idea that the state completely owns all corporations and all forms of production. In return they would promise to ensure a livable wage, free education and free healthcare etc. This leads to 99% of the population living just barely above poverty level, while those that are in powerful positions in government or at least well-connected to those in power to become fabulously wealthy. The level of taxation levied upon these poor souls to accomplish this ensured that the masses were poor and stayed poor their entire lives.

With National Socialism a person that founds a company or corporation gets to retain full ownership of said company. The wealth of the company is still distributed out amongst it’s employees, but in a drastically different manner. Much more beneficial to all involved. Lets use the analogy of a pirate ship crew. Pirate ships operated on a share by share basis. Yes the captain might get 10 or even more shares of the booty they collected, but if they captured a ship loaded with gold for example, even the single share that the deck hands and galley hands would get could be a small fortune. Likewise if a company was very successful and made billions of dollars, like many of today’s companies do, the single share that the janitors or night watchmen would get could be enormous sums of money. Name one other form of government where a janitor can afford a large house, fancy cars, multiple children and still afford to send them all to college as well. You can’t. There aren’t any.

This method of guaranteeing even the lowliest of employees would enjoy a full share of the company’s profits easily explains the level of fervent fanaticism Hitler enjoyed from his followers. The effectiveness of National Socialism is beyond debate as seen by how Hitler was able to take a country that had not only been utterly decimated in World War One, but incessantly raped and pillaged by the Jewish elite bankers such as the Rothchild’s after the war during the Weimar Republic. In a mere 12 years he took this ragged husk of a nation and rebuilt it to be the single most powerful nation in the world by the beginning of World War Two. There existed some forms of taxation in Hitler’s Germany, but most of that came directly from the companies making huge profits. Not on the backs of the individual. Other than military and infrastructure spending, most of these taxes were used to help the population have bigger families. For example, when you purchased a home the state would pay for 25% of your house once you had a child. If you continued to have more children you would have your entire mortgage paid off by the state upon the birth of your fourth child. Many other forms of assistance were geared towards helping the people be able to afford to have large families as well.

Exactly the same right?

Communism is based on the idea that the state completely owns all corporations and all forms of production. In return they would promise to ensure a livable wage, free education and free healthcare etc. This leads to 99% of the population living just barely above poverty level, while those that are in powerful positions in government or at least well-connected to those in power to become fabulously wealthy. The level of taxation levied upon these poor souls to accomplish this ensured that the masses were poor and stayed poor their entire lives. With National Socialism a person that founds a company or corporation gets to retain full ownership of said company. The wealth of the company is still distributed out amongst it’s employees, but in a drastically different manner. Much more beneficial to all involved. Lets use the analogy of a pirate ship crew. Pirate ships operated on a share by share basis. Yes the captain might get 10 or even more shares of the booty they collected, but if they captured a ship loaded with gold for example, even the single share that the deck hands and galley hands would get could be a small fortune. Likewise if a company was very successful and made billions of dollars, like many of today’s companies do, the single share that the janitors or night watchmen would get could be enormous sums of money. Name one other form of government where a janitor can afford a large house, fancy cars, multiple children and still afford to send them all to college as well. You can’t. There aren’t any. This method of guaranteeing even the lowliest of employees would enjoy a full share of the company’s profits easily explains the level of fervent fanaticism Hitler enjoyed from his followers. The effectiveness of National Socialism is beyond debate as seen by how Hitler was able to take a country that had not only been utterly decimated in World War One, but incessantly raped and pillaged by the Jewish elite bankers such as the Rothchild’s after the war during the Weimar Republic. In a mere 12 years he took this ragged husk of a nation and rebuilt it to be the single most powerful nation in the world by the beginning of World War Two. There existed some forms of taxation in Hitler’s Germany, but most of that came directly from the companies making huge profits. Not on the backs of the individual. Other than military and infrastructure spending, most of these taxes were used to help the population have bigger families. For example, when you purchased a home the state would pay for 25% of your house once you had a child. If you continued to have more children you would have your entire mortgage paid off by the state upon the birth of your fourth child. Many other forms of assistance were geared towards helping the people be able to afford to have large families as well. Exactly the same right?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

What minority are you referencing? How does a minority take control in? You're not making sense. Minority to me says,"lack of political power"

[–] 7 pts

Okay, just from that one sentence I can tell there is a huge knowledge gap that you have and I am not sure where to start... I guess Federalist #51 can at least introduce you to these ideas, try that first.

To more directly address your ignorance let me just say that the despots at the head of the CCP are a very small unchanging group of people compared to the 1.4 billion person population that has literally no say or control over much of anything. That is one type of "tyranny of the minority" but there are others.

[–] 0 pt

But it WORKS. Fastest growing GDP. Second fastest wage growth, Cali is #1 What do people need say or control over?

[–] 2 pts (edited )

"it works" is relative to your goals. If you want to be a slave to someone else's desires and are not interested in propelling the human species forward then yea... that works. But if you want to promote evolutionary progress and have the ability to manifest your own destiny then I personally would rather a system that promotes the best brightest and strongest to success so that humanity remains progressive in its development.

I tell ya what, since you want to be a little bitch you come live with me and I will provide a socialist life for you and you can work for me and do what I tell you. Sound good Slave?

>Fastest growing GDP. Second fastest wage growth

They also are transitioning from a agricultural to industrial to consumer economy in a manipulated fiat environment. Don't confuse correlation with causation.

>Cali is #1

ROFL! Yea, stick with that argument. That one will be a winner for you.

>What do people need say or control over?

You are what's wrong with the world. kill yourself now, stop waiting. You will eventually so just get it over with.

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/06/15/asia-pacific/china-organ-harvesting-un/

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/top-us-official-says-growing-body-evidence-shows-covid-19-leaked-chinese-lab

China released covid as a bio-weapon to put an end to the Hong Kong Freedom Movement, eliminate an increasingly elderly and expensive retirement age population, and damage foreign adversaries. This is 6th gen warfare. I would say that the Chinese people should have a say and some control over that holocaust. Wouldn't you?