WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

268

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

You vastly misunderstand the tools of jewish subversion. It's not even debatable.

Look up the start date of women's suffrage in Germany. Look up the start date of Weimar. Post results. Try to make a connection.

Again, you're not seeing the *process *of subversion, or at least you're refusing to acknowledge it.

The jews always want to subvert White society. That goes without question. So then, why didn't they bring on the mass immigration of shitskins in the 1800s? Why didn't they legalize gay marriage in 1965? Why wasn't abortion legal in 1907? Why is pedo fuckery still illegal despite them wanting it? Why not push for equal numbers of men and women in the workforce in 1890? Why do they push for senators who want more diversity for America, in states like Vermont without diversity?

The frog slowly boils. Benchmarks like women's suffrage and mass shitskin immigration are pivotal in the slow boil. Learn this or perish.

[–] 0 pt

Without jews and non-Whites, even if women were still voting, 99% of the problems in the West wouldn't exist.

Again, women voting didn't create the 1965 Immigration Act which brought in 90 million shitskins that commit 99% of all crime, shit in the street and are a $2trn/year welfare drain on society, jews did.

Non-Whites are THE problem. Even if all you did was expel every jew and other non-White in the West, 99% of every problem would evaporate overnight, even with women voting.

You fell for a jewish trick by blaming every problem on women rather than the ((('people'))) responsible.