![Look how they spin the Thomas Sewell story [591x1280 - 114KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/GzzKGD.jpg){kind=link}
Perhaps, but camera guy did a piss poor job of documenting what needed to be in order to rescue their case. As it stands, unless there is security cam footage from within the lobby of the building, it's going to be the word of the property owners and any witnesses against the two trespassers (let alone two trespassers who hit a black man and called him a monkey). Part of the argument I'm making here has to do with Sewell's complete lack of sense about the optics - we all know by now that we don't live in a world of justice by the book.
Everything you type is a lie. Either that or you spent 100x more time blathering on your keyboard than actually watching the videos.
Perhaps, but camera guy did a piss poor job of documenting what needed to be in order to rescue their case
That's true.
As it stands, unless there is security cam footage from within the lobby of the building, it's going to be the word of the property owners and any witnesses against the two trespassers (let alone two trespassers who hit a black man and called him a monkey). Part of the argument I'm making here has to do with Sewell's complete lack of sense about the optics - we all know by now that we don't live in a world of justice by the book.
That is also true, and it's also true that it's not what you know, it's what you can prove. I don't know if this would even go to a jury trial, as I don't know the law in Aus, but I do know it's a universal that you have a right defend yourself if you're being assaulted.
(post is archived)